Tuesday, October 29, 2013

Rihanna, Lady Gaga and What's Really Behind Burqa Swag...




Ladies! Wondering what to wear tonight that will turn heads and get all the boys excited? May I suggest a sexed-up burqa or perhaps a naughty niqab? While harem pants are v last season, veils are terribly in vogue. Not only do they add an exotic edge, but black is extremely mu-slimming.
All the celebs are getting involved. One such person is Rihanna, who was recently asked to leave a mosque in Abu Dhabi after posing for photos wearing her own interpretation of a burqa. Pairing a hooded black jumpsuit with bright red lipstick, Ri-Ri's brand of Islama-chic proved a hit on Instagram, but not among staff of the Sheikh Zayed Grand Mosque. Ri-Ri is reported to have been ejected, and there followed a statement that the photos were "inconsistent with the sanctity of the mosque".
Rihanna's entire Instagram account is a chronicle of controversy and questionable decisions, so this latest episode isn't much of a surprise. What is noteworthy about the Abu Dhabi incident, however, is that it is the latest in a long line of attempts by western popular culture to eroticise the veil. From the creation of a burqa Barbie to Diesel ads featuring a tattooed woman wearing nothing but a denim niqab, overtly sexual depictions of the veil are suddenly everywhere. You can even buy a "Sexy Middle Eastern Arab girl burqa Halloween costume" from eBay. And there's a suitably ghastly name for this phenomenon: "burqa swag".
We can lay at least some of the blame for this on Lady Gaga. She's been trotting around in extravagant interpretations of the hijab for years. In August she took her Muslim-baiting to another level with the apparent leak of a new track called Burqa. With lyrics such as "Do you wanna see me naked, lover? Do you wanna peak underneath the cover?" Burqa isn't exactly a sensitive exploration of Islam. And nor were her fans' responses to it. Soon after the leak, Twitter was awash with Gaga fans posting pictures of themselves in Orientalist attire with the hashtag #burqaswag.
One of the many problems with burqa swag is its confusion over what a burqa is in the first place. There is a world of difference between a burqa, an abaya, a chador, a niqab etc. Yet in western discourse these are often grouped together. Indeed, the burqa has become something of a convenient symbol not just for the entire spectrum of Muslim culture, but for the Arab world and the Middle East in general. A handy way to lump all that "otherness" together and defuse the threat it poses.
There's a certain glamour associated with the pariah status that, much as we might like to think otherwise, Muslims bear in western societies. Cavorting with the Muslim world generates a kind of transgression by proxy for the savvy pop star. You could say #burqaswag is this generation's Like a Prayer. While Madonna romping with saints and dancing around burning crosses may have shocked 1989 sensibilities, goading Catholics just isn't that risqué anymore. No, if you're really going to prove yourself as a modern day bad girl, the most effective place to do so is in a mosque. Indeed Madge herself appears to be quite aware of this. According to recent reports, Madonna is now studying the Qur'an.
Of course, the irony of burqa swag is that it holds in itself the seeds of its own destruction. You can respond to a perceived threat either by attacking it or appropriating it. French politicians have channelled their prejudices against Islam into banning the full veil; burqa swag neutralises the threat of Islam by holding it in an erotic embrace.
Appropriate too effectively, of course, and all the danger is gone … and with it the allure. Which is good news for Rihanna fans because, let's face it, she looks better in hotpants.
Arwa Mahdawi
http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/oct/24/rihanna-lady-gaga-burqa-swag

Sunday, October 27, 2013

Cavewoman Paintings ...



(Phys.org) —Pennsylvania State University Archaeologist Dean Snow is reporting to National Geographic that studies he's undertaken of cave art dating back to the Paleolithic indicate much of it was done by women, not men as is commonly believed.

Dean Snow has been studying ancient handprints in caves at the behest of National Geographic for nearly a decade. It began, he says, after reading about work done by geologist John Manning—he'd found that average finger lengths in people vary by gender. Men tend to have longer ring fingers than  for example, while the opposite is true for women. Some time later, he reports, he was looking at pictures of  and noticed that the fingers on the hands appeared to conform to Manning's description of female hands. That set him off on a voyage of discovery. He began looking at cave art in a new way, and even developed an algorithm that offers the likelihood of a handprint belonging to a man or woman—he tested it on modern volunteers in Europe and found it to be approximately 60 percent accurate. He notes that differences between gender finger length in Paleolithic people was more pronounced than it is in modern humans who have more overlap. Because of this, he believes his algorithm is more accurate when measuring the people who made the cave art.
The cave art under review is early examples of hand stencils, where the person making them placed their hand against a wall then blew paint at it (through a straw or directly from their mouth) to create an outline. Such art has been found in caves in Australia, Africa, Borneo, Argentina and more famously in Spain and France. Snow says that thus far his studies have revealed that approximately 75 percent (24 out of 32) of such hand art was likely done by women.
Up until recently most scientists have assumed cave art was most likely done by men—the depictions of women and animals being hunted seemed to sum up the life of hunters, the male half of a hunter-gatherer society. That idea has slowly been changing as archeologists have begun to take a closer look. Biologist Dale Guthrie, for example, conducted a study of the hand art and concluded that they were most likely made by adolescent boys.
Snow theorizes that if  were doing most of the cave art, it's possible they played a larger, more important role in how hunter-gatherer societies functioned than has been thought.

Read more at: http://phys.org/news/2013-10-archeologist-paleolithic-cave-art-women.html#jCp

Monday, October 21, 2013

Letter From A Bahraini Prison... (Happy Birthday Hero)


Listen to this page using ReadSpeaker
[Zainab Al-Khawaja. Image from author's family archive][Zainab Al-Khawaja. Image from author's family archive]
Great leaders are immortal, their words and deeds echo through the years, decades, and centuries. They echo across oceans and borders and become an inspiration that touches the lives of many who are willing to learn. One such leader is the remarkable Martin Luther King Jr. As I read his words, I imagine him reading out to us from another land, another time, to teach us some very important lessons. Above all, he tells us, we should never become bitter or sink to the level of our oppressors; that we should be willing to make great sacrifices for freedom.
As seeds of hope and resistance to oppression started flowering across the Arab world, the people of Bahrain saw the first signs of a new dawn. One that promised an end to a long night of dictatorship and oppression, a long winter of silence and fear, and to spread the light and warmth of a new age of freedom and democracy.
With that hope and determination, the people of Bahrain took to the streets on 14 February 2011 to peacefully demand their rights. Their songs, poetry, paintings and chants for freedom were met with bullets, tanks, toxic tear gas, and birdshot guns. The brutal Al Khalifa regime was determined to end the creative, peaceful revolution by resorting to violence and spreading fear. 
Faced with the regime’s brutality, Bahrainis showed great restraint. Day after long day, protesters held up flowers to soldiers and mercenaries who would shoot at them. Protesters stood with bare chests and arms raised, shouting, "peaceful, peaceful" [silmiyya, silmiyya] before they fell onto the ground, covered with blood. Thousands of Bahrainis have since been detained and tortured for so-called crimes such as “illegal gathering” and “inciting hatred against the regime.” 
Two years later, the Bahraini regime's atrocities continue. Bahrainis are still being killed, detained, injured, and tortured for demanding democracy. When I look into the eyes of Bahraini protesters today, too many times I see that bitterness has overtaken hope. The same bitterness Martin Luther King Jr. saw in the eyes of rioters in the slums of Chicago in 1966. He saw that the same people who had been leading non-violent protests, who had risked life and limb without the desire to strike back, were later convinced that violence is the only language the world understood. 
I, like King, find myself saddened to find some of the same protesters who faced Bahrain’s tanks and guns with bare chests and flowers, today asking, "What's the use of non-violence? What’s the point of moral superiority, if no one is even listening?" Martin Luther King Jr. explains that this despair is only natural when people who sacrifice so much see no change in sight and feel their suffering has been worthless.
Ironically, change towards democracy has been so slow in Bahrain largely due to the support that the world’s most powerful democratic nations continue to give to the dictators here. Through selling them arms and providing economic and political support, the United States and other western governments have proven to the people of Bahrain that they stand with the Al Khalifa monarchy against the democratic movement.
As I was reading through Martin Luther King's words I found myself wishing he were alive. I found myself wondering what he would have to say about the US administration's support of Bahraini dictators. What he would say about turning a blind eye to the blood and tears being spilt in the quest for freedom. All I had to do was turn a page, and this time Martin Luther King spoke not to me, but to you, to Americans:
John F. Kennedy said 'those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable.' Increasingly, by choice or by accident, this is the role our nation has taken—the role of those who make peaceful revolution impossible by refusing to give up the privileges and the pleasures that come from the immense profits of overseas investment. I am convinced that if we are to get on the right side of the world revolution, we as a nation must undergo a radical revolution of values. (..) a true revolution of values will soon cause us to question the fairness and justice of many of our past and present policies.
These are revolutionary times. All over the globe men are revolting against old systems of exploitation and new systems of justice and equality, are being born… We in the west must support these revolutions.
It is a sad fact that because of comfort, complacency… and our proneness to adjust to injustice, the western nations that irritated so much of the revolutionary spirit of the modern world have now become the arch anti-revolutionaries. We must move past indecision to action. We must find new ways to speak for peace… and justice throughout the world, a world that borders on our doors. If we do not act, we shall surely be dragged down the long, dark and shameful corridors of time reserved for those who possess power without compassion, might without morality, and strength without sight.
 
The echo of Martin Luther King's words has travelled across oceans, through the walls and metal bars of a Bahraini prison, and into the overcrowded and filthy cell I live in. I hear the words of this great American leader, whose unbending dedication to morality and justice made him the great leader he was. As I marvel at his wisdom from my tiny cell, I wonder if the people of the United States are also listening.
Being a political prisoner in Bahrain, I try to find a way to fight from within the fortress of the enemy, as Mandela describes it. Not long after I was placed in a cell with fourteen people—two of whom are convicted murderers—I was handed the orange prison uniform. I knew I could not wear the uniform without having to swallow a little of my dignity. Refusing to wear the convicts' clothes because I have not committed a crime, that was my small version of civil disobedience. Denying my visitation rights, and not letting me see my family and my three-year-old daughter, that has been their punishment. That is why I am on hunger strike. 
Prison administrators ask me why I am on hunger strike. I reply, “Because I want to see my baby.” They respond, nonchalantly, “Obey and you will see her.” But if I obey, my little Jude will not in fact be seeing hermother, but rather a broken version of her. I wrote to the prison administration that I refuse to wear the convicts’ uniform because "no moral man can patiently adjust to injustice." (Thoreau). 
What makes jail difficult is that you are living with your enemy, even in the most basic ways. If you want to eat, you stand in front of him with your plastic tray. And every day, one faces the possibility of being ridiculed, shouted at, or humiliated for any reason. Or for no reason. But I have let the words of great men and women help me through these times. When the “specialist” threatened to beat me for telling an inmate that she has a right to call her lawyer, I did not shout back. I repeated King's words in my head: "No matter how emotional your opponents are, you must be calm.” 
Until one day, I had had enough of people telling me that I am getting all my rights and refusing to face that I have responsibilities. After hearing that sentence over and over, I finally got angry. And what is worse, I felt so frustrated that I shouted back. 
But then hadn't a great man once said that in the struggle for justice we, “must not become bitter” and that we should "never to sink to the lever of our oppressors”? 
A doctor came to see me and said “you might fall into a coma, your vital organs might stop working, your blood sugar levels are so low, and all this for what… a uniform!”
I replied: “I am glad you weren't with Rosa Parks on that bus, to tell the woman who sparked the civil rights movement, “that it was all for nothing but a chair.” When the doctor started asking about the African American movement, I offered my Martin Luther King book. If you know me you would know that I very rarely offer to give away my books.
Sometimes, through his words, Martin Luther King has been a companion, a cellmate more than a teacher. He says, “No one can understand my conflict who hasn't looked into the eyes of those he loves, knowing that he has no alternative but to take a stand that leaves them tormented.” I do understand. He wrote as though he sits beside me. “The jail experience… is a life without the singing of a bird, without the sight of the sun, moon, and stars, without the felt presence of fresh air. In short, it is life without the beauties of life, it is bare existence—cold, cruel, degenerating".
My father, my hero and my friend, sentenced to life in prison for his human rights work, has also refused to wear the grey prison uniform. As usual, the government tries to “put us in our places” by taking away what means most to us. They will not allow my father his family visit. And to further taunt him, they, for the first time, said he would be able to visit me in prison if he wore the uniform. Cruelty is the Al Khalifa regime's trademark, but unwavering courage and patience is my dad's. No emotional pressure will break him.
The family visit is the one thing one looks forward to in prison. My father and I will not be seeing our family or each other, but the struggle for our rights will continue. Until we see our family next, we hold them in our hearts.
Yesterday I fell asleep while looking at my prison cell door with its iron bars, and I had a dream. But this time it was a small and simple dream, not of democracy and freedom. I just saw my smiling mother, holding my daughter's hand, standing at the door of my prison cell. I saw them walk through the metal. My mother sat on my prison bed as my daughter and I lay side by side, our heads in her lap. I tickle Jude and she laughs, and my heart fills with joy. Suddenly I feel we are in a cool and protective shadow, I look up and see my father standing by the bed, looking at the three of us and smiling. I dream of those I love, it is their love that gives me the strength to fight for the dreams of our country.
Zainab Alkhawaja
Isa Town Women Prison

Sunday, October 20, 2013

New Ad Campaign Uses Popular Search Terms to Show How the World Really Feels About Women...



Though women’s status across the world has improved over the last few decades, we’re still largely second-class citizens in comparison to men: we make less money, have more difficulty accessing education and affordable healthcare and face much more violence than our male counterparts.

To emphasize the extent of global gender inequality, UN Women–an arm of the U.N. that focuses on women’s issues–has created a powerful advertising campaign that uses data collected from Google on the most popular search terms. As it turns out, the most popular Google queries are indicative of entrenched sexist attitudes that still persist today.

http://newsfeed.time.com/author/jessicaroytime/



UN-Women-Search-Engine-Campaign-1
Gute Werbung/UN Women
UN-Women-Search-Engine-Campaign-2
Gute Werbung/UN Women
UN-Women-Search-Engine-Campaign-4
Gute Werbung/UN Women
UN-Women-Search-Engine-Campaign-3

Thursday, October 17, 2013

Size Six: The Western Women’s Harem


‘I was born in a harem.’ That sentence marked the beginning of Fatema Mernissi’s first book. In the West, it provokes a smile, but Mernissi herself finds it hard to appreciate this reaction. The Western image of a harem differs from the Eastern reality. A harem is not a magical place with beautiful women, but a prison in which women are repressed, and men confronted with rebellious lovers aiming to spoil their sexual romps. In real harems fear reigns among the women while doubts plague the men. It is anything but paradise.
In her fourth book, ‘Le Harem et l’Occident’, Mernissi, a Moroccan sociologist, examines the Western smile at the word ‘harem’. She writes about the suppression of women, sex objects, shame, sexual desires and cultural and religious concepts. Mernissi concludes that Western women are not much better off than their veiled sisters in the East.
It was during my unsuccessful attempt to buy a cotton skirt in an American department store that I was told my hips were too large to fit into a size six. That day I stumbled onto one of the keys to the enigma of passive beauty in Western harem fantasies.
‘In this entire store, there is no skirt for me?’ I said. ‘You are joking.’ I was very suspicious and thought that the saleslady just might be too tired to help me. At least I could understand that. But the lady added a condescending judgment, which sounded to me like an Imam’s fatwa. It left no room for discussion: ‘You are too big!’ she said.
‘I am too big compared to what?’ I asked, looking at her intently, because I realised that I was facing a critical cultural gap here.
‘Compared to a size six,’ came the saleslady’s reply.
Her voice had a clear-cut edge to it that is typical of those who enforce religious laws. ‘Size four and six are the norm,’ she went on, encouraged by my bewildered look. ‘Deviant sizes, such as the one you need, can be bought in special stores.’
That was the first time that I had ever heard such nonsense about my size. The flattering comments I received from men in Morocco regarding my particularly generous hips had for decades led me to believe that the entire planet shared their convictions. It is true that with advancing age I had been receiving fewer and fewer compliments when walking in the medina, and sometimes the silence around me in the bazaars was deafening. But I had learned long ago not to rely too much on the outside world for my sense of self-worth.
In any case, nothing is too serious or definite in the medina, where everything can be negotiated. But things were different in that New York department store. In fact, I have to confess that I lost my usual self-confidence. In that peaceful store that I had entered so triumphantly, as sovereign consumer ready to spend money, I felt savagely attacked. My hips, until then the sign of a relaxed and uninhibited maturity, were suddenly being condemned as a deformity.
‘And who says that everyone must be a size six?’ I joked to the saleslady, deliberately neglecting to mention size four, which is the size of my skinny twelve-year-old niece.
At that point, the saleslady suddenly gave me an anxious look. ‘The norm is everywhere, my dear,’ she said. ‘It’s all over, in the magazines, on television, in the ads. You can’t escape it. There is Calvin Klein, Ralph Lauren, Gianni Versace, Giorgio Armani, Mario Valentino, Salvatore Ferragamo, Christian Dior, Yves Saint-Laurent, Christian Lacroix, and Jean-Paul Gaultier. Big department stores go by the norm.’ She paused and then concluded, ‘If they sold size 14 or 16, which is probably what you need, they would go bankrupt.’
She stopped for a minute and then stared at me, intrigued. ‘Where on earth do you come from? I am sorry I can’t help you. Really I am.’ And she looked it too. All of a sudden, she was interested and brushed off another woman who was seeking her attention. Only then did I notice that she was probably my age, in her late 50s. But unlike me, she had the thin body of an adolescent girl. Her knee length, navy blue, Channel dress had a white silk collar reminiscent of the subdued elegance of aristocratic French Catholic schoolgirls at the turn of the century. A pearl-studded belt emphasised the slimness of her waist. With her meticulously styled short hair and sophisticated makeup; at first glance she looked half my age.
‘I come from a country where there is no size for women’s clothes,’ I told her. ‘I buy my own material and the neighbourhood seamstress makes me the silk or leather skirt I want. Neither the seamstress nor I know exactly what size my new skirt is. No one cares about my size in Morocco as long as I pay taxes on time. Actually, I don’t know what my size is, to tell you the truth.’
The saleswomen laughed merrily and said that I should advertise my country as a paradise for stressed working women. ‘You mean you don’t watch your weight?’ she inquired, with more than a tinge of disbelief in her voice. Then, after a brief moment of silence, she added in a lower register, as if talking to herself: ‘Many women working in highly paid fashion-related jobs could lose their positions if they didn’t keep a strict diet.’
Her words sounded so simple, but the threat they implied was so cruel. I realised for the first time that maybe ‘size six’ was a more violent restriction imposed on women than the Muslim veil. Quickly I said goodbye so as not to make any more demands on the saleslady’s time or involve her in any more unwelcome, confidential exchanges about age-discriminating salary cuts. A surveillance camera was probably watching us both.
Yes, I thought as I wandered off, I have finally found the answer to my harem enigma. Unlike the Muslim man, who uses space to establish male domination by excluding women from the public arena, the Western man manipulates time and light. He declares that in order to be beautiful, a woman must look 14 years old. If she dares to look 50 or, worse, 60, she is beyond the pale. By putting the spotlight on the female child and framing her as the ideal of beauty, he condemns the mature woman to invisibility. In fact, the modern Western man enforces one of Immanuel Kant’s 19th-century theories: To be beautiful, women have to appear childish and brainless. When a women looks mature and self-assertive, or allows her hips to expand, she is condemned as ugly. Thus, the walls of the European harem separate youthful beauty from ugly maturity.
Western attitudes, I thought, are even more dangerous and cunning than the Muslim ones because the weapon used against women is time. Time is less visible and more fluid than space. The Western man uses images and spotlights to freeze female beauty within an idealised childhood, and forces women to perceive aging – the normal unfolding of the years – as a shameful devaluation. ‘Here I am, transformed into a dinosaur,’ I caught myself saying aloud as I went up and down the rows of skirts in the store, hoping – to no avail – to prove the saleslady wrong.
Yes, I suddenly felt not only very ugly, but also quite useless in that store, where, if you had big hips, you were simply out of the picture. You drifted into the fringes of nothingness. By putting the spotlight on the prepubescent female, the Western man veils the older, more mature woman, wrapping her in shrouds of ugliness. This idea gives me the chills because it tattoos the invisible harem directly onto a woman’s skin. Chinese foot-binding worked the same way. Men declared beautiful only those women who had small, childlike feet. In feudal China, a beautiful woman was the one who voluntarily sacrificed her right to unhindered physical movement by mutilating her own feet, and thereby proving that her main goal in life was to please men. Similarly, in the Western world, I was expected to shrink my hips into a size six if I wanted to find a decent skirt tailored for a beautiful woman. We Muslim women have only one month of fasting, Ramadan, but the poor Western woman who diets has to fast 12 months a year.
According to the writer Naomi Wolf, the ideal size for American models decreased sharply in the 1990s: ‘A generation ago, the average model weighed 8% less than the average American woman, whereas today she weights 23% less.’ The shrinking of the ideal size, according to Wolf, is one of the primary causes of anorexia and other health-related problems.
The West, I realised, was the only part of the world where women’s fashion is a man’s business. He controls the whole fashion industry, from cosmetics to underwear. In places like Morocco, where you design your own clothes and discuss them with craftsmen, fashion is your own business. Not so in the West. Naomi Wolf explains in her book ‘The Beauty Myth’: ‘Men have engineered a prodigious amount of fetish-like, fashion-related paraphernalia. Powerful industries – the US$33-billion-a-year diet industry, the $20-billion cosmetic industry, the $300-million cosmetic surgery industry, and the $billion pornography industry – have arisen from the capital made out of unconscious anxieties, and are in turn able, through their influence on mass culture, to use, stimulate, and reinforce the hallucination in a rising economic spiral.’
But how does the system work? Why do women accept it? Of all the possible explanations, I like that of the French sociologist Pierre Bourdieu the best. In his latest book, ‘La Domination Masculine’, he introduces a concept he calls la violence symbolique. ‘Symbolic violence is a form of power which is hammered directly on the body, and as if by magic, without any apparent physical constraint. But this magic works only because it activates the codes pounded in the deepest layers of the body.’ Reading Bourdieu, I had the impression that I was beginning to better understand Western man’s psyche. The cosmetic and fashion industries are only the tip of the iceberg, he states. Something else is going on at a far deeper level, which is why women are so ready to adhere to their dictates. Otherwise, why, argues Bourdieu, would women make their lives more difficult, for example, by preferring men who are taller or older than they are?
Women relinquish what Bourdieu calls the ordinary signs of sexual hierarchy, such as old age and a larger body. By so doing, he explains, they spontaneously accept the subservient position. Bourdieu calls this spontaneity ‘the magic enchantment’.
Both Wolf and Bourdieu come to the conclusion that insidious ‘body codes’ paralyse Western women’s abilities to compete for power. Even though access to education and professional opportunities seem wide open, the rules of the game are very different according to gender. Women enter the power game with so much of their energy deflected to their physical appearance that one hesitates to say the playing field is level. ‘A cultural fixation on female thinness is not an obsession about female obedience. Dieting is the most potent political sedative in women’s history; a quietly mad population is a tractable one,’ says Wolf. Research, she contends, confirms what most women know too well: concern with weight leads to a ‘virtual collapse’ of self-esteem and sense of effectiveness. Prolonged and periodic caloric restriction results in a distinctive personality whose traits are passivity, anxiety, and emotionality.
‘I thank you, Allah, for sparing me the tyranny of the size six harem,’ I repeatedly said to myself while seated on the Paris-Casablanca flight, on my way back home at last. ‘I am so happy that the conservative male elite does not know about it. Imagine the fundamentalists switching from the veil to forcing women to fit in size six!’
How can you stage a credible political demonstration and shout in the streets that your human rights have been violated when you cannot find the right skirt?
Fatema Mernissi | August 2003 issue- See more at: 
http://odewire.com/46323/size-six-the-western-womens-harem.html#sthash.F1Qhl8Dh.dpuf

Monday, October 14, 2013

Eid Mubaruk ...

                          (image: http://www.cnn.com/2012/10/24/middleeast/gallery/eid-al-adha/index.html)

A woman prays during Eid prayers at the Badshahi Mosque in Lahore, Pakistan. Eid al-Adha, or the Feast of Sacrifice, marks the end of the annual Hajj pilgrimage to Mecca, Saudi Arabia, and honors the Prophet Ibrahim's willingness to sacrifice his son, Ishmael, on the order of God, who then provided a lamb in the boy's place. Around 3 million Muslims make the annual Hajj pilgrimage to Mecca, which is one of the five pillars of Islam.

She Is Afghanistan's First Street Artist, and She Might Actually Change Our Views...


Now, to anyone thinking that graffiti is just a public nuisance produced by overgrown teenagers with underdeveloped egos: you couldn't be more wrong - at least in this case.
I met with Shamsia Hassani: a young woman and the first street artist ever to emerge from the exhausted streets of Kabul, Afghanistan.
Only 25 years old and teaches drawing at the Faculty of Fine Arts at Kabul University, her story just might challenge your views on graffiti - and on Afghan women.
2013-10-10-253325_381754218612034_182578545_n.jpg
Fear
"For two years I was the only graffiti artist in Afghanistan," Shamsia says, and considering the massive perils, one has to undergo to paint graffiti in the streets of Kabul, it is no wonder that people have been a bit cautious picking up the trend.
Shamsia has faced various kinds of threats and harassment when painting:
"It is very dangerous for a girl to paint in the streets in Kabul," she says, "sometimes people come and harass me; they don't think it is allowed in Islam for a woman to stand in the street and do graffiti."
And vigilante citizens are not the only threats facing an Afghan graffiti artist, suicide bombings are still a very real danger in Kabul, Shamsia tells me.
"That's why I paint very fast, when I paint in the streets," she says and squeezes one hand with the other.
Why?
But, rather than the perils she has to undergo in order to paint, it is the question 'why?' that makes Shamsia's story interesting: why would a young Muslim woman, risk her life to go and paint graffiti in Afghanistan?
2013-10-10-943177_376896399097816_2025193747_n.jpg
Then again, why would anyone risk anything to paint graffiti? 
Thrill, passion, self-exposure are common conceptions of motivation for graffiti artists - but not really satisfying ones. Shamsia knows why she paints.
Cover
Fear of bombings might still be part of the everyday in Kabul, but so are a lot of other things, like the treatment and development of a shattered community, the fight for women's rights, the struggle for freedom of speech, not to mention the toils of altering Afghanistan's image in the eyes of the outside world. "I just want some happiness," Shamsia says and looks down at her paint stained fingers.
That's why she paints.
Shamsia's motifs are both letter- and character based, and they address topics of freedom of speech and women's rights.
2013-10-10-ONWALL.jpg
She paints a guitar playing the alphabet, so you can sing out any words you want. She paints a fish with a big, black bubble of suppressed breath in its belly because "things grow dark as they age." 
And she paints a woman in a burka who is "strong, happy and with movement" illustrating her point that the prison of the Afghan woman is not the burka, but her lack of rights - and that problem, Shamsia says, is not solved by simply removing the burka.
Paradise?
It is difficult not to sympathize with Shamsia's actions, and hearing her reasons for painting the term vandalism seems wildly out of place:
"I want to cover the memories of war from peoples mind," she says and adds: "If I do graffiti on some destroyed wall it is like I cover all the bad memories, then, when people see that wall, they cannot remember that bad memories are in it."
2013-10-10-RussianCultureCenter.jpg
Shamsia expresses a beautiful naïveté, an optimistic spirit essential to any fight for freedom and to the rebuilding of a recent warzone - but what about our western graffiti artists, what do their paintings mean; what do they fight for?
Maybe we believe that our struggles are over, that there is nothing left to fight for, and that that is actually a good thing?
Shamsia can paint for peace, she can paint for women's rights or the freedom of speech, but what is the goal of the western graffiti artist, the one sprouted from a seemingly post-ideological society - what are they expressing?
Shamsia vandalizes buildings scarred by war; western graffiti artists vandalize buildings scarred by nothing.
Maybe there's a message in that?
Follow Erik B. Duckert on Twitter: www.twitter.com/Erik_Duckert
http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/erik-b-duckert/afghanistan-street-artist_b_4076320.html?utm_hp_ref=uk


Tuesday, October 8, 2013

Iran's First Female Rapper...




Salome MC is known as Iran's first female rapper. She grew up in Tehran, Iran and as a teenager got involved in graffiti then rap as a way to communicate. After some time the urban life started to put a strain on her, emphasized by struggles in her personal relationships. For her, the chaos that occurred in the post election fall out of 2009 was the last straw, convincing her that it would be best to leave and find her utopia somewhere else. Salome ended up in a small city in Japan, where she found her peace - which is also what her name, Salome, means. Living in Japan now she is involved in fine arts in contemporary forms, while still continuing Hip-Hop as a means to share her experiences.

Sunday, October 6, 2013

Fighting India's Ugly Fancy For Fair Skin...



Rosalyn D'Mello, a journalist based in India’s capital New Delhi, still recalls how her family and friends used to mock her because of her dark complexion when she was a young girl.
"They used to call me kaali (black), ‘blacky’ and even ‘negro’ because of my dark skin," she said.
"My mother was cruel about my skin shade. She wanted me to use 'Fair and Lovely'," a skin lightening cream," D’Mello said. "I don’t believe in the norm that equates beauty with skin colour."
Millions of Indians, overwhelmingly women, face biases like D’Mello on a daily basis.
To counter deeply held cultural perceptions on race and beauty, Women of Worth (WOW), a non-governmental organisation based in the southern city of Chennai, promoted a campaign called "Dark is Beautiful" with renewed vigour in August to highlight the issue.

Though the campaign was initially launched in 2009, it gained prominence this year after Bollywood actress Nandita Das backed the campaign with a string of print advertisements that called on every Indian to "Stay Unfair, Stay Beautiful".
"I have always been very outspoken about this issue, but till recently it was more informal," Das, known for critically acclaimed films such as "Fire" and "Earth", told Al Jazeera in an email interview. "As the issue impacts so many people, young girls in particular, by default I have become a champion of it."

"I have had directors and camerapersons telling me that it would be good if I made my skin lighter as I was playing an educated upper class woman."
The initiative has received a lot of attention after Das announced her support. Thousands of people have signed the petition and the popularity of the "Dark is Beautiful" Facebook page has been growing.

Colour bias
"It should be seen in the context of caste system that maintains through a variety of ways to exploit the labour or oppressed castes, who happen to have darker skin compared to the upper castes," Kavita Krishnan, Secretary of the All India Progressive Women’s Association (AIPWA), told Al Jazeera.



"Colonial rule and its overt racism has been adopted and integrated into the society and compounded by the caste attitude. There is this caste sense of superiority, despite Indians' default setting being dark."
The deep-rooted colour bias has ensured that in certain professions such as aviation, films and many other white collar jobs, people with fair skin are generally the preferred choice.
In the western state of Maharashtra, about 100 tribal girls, who were trained to be airhostesses and cabin crew under a government scholarship programme aimed at empowering them, were denied jobs apparently because of their darker skin colour.
Only eight of them landed jobs, but only as ground staff, according to a report by the Indian Express newspaper.
Marriage, which in India's case is mostly arranged, is an ordeal especially for women as looking fair is the dominant theme.
Matrimonial advertisements reflect this social trend where potential brides and bridegrooms with fair complexion are the most in demand. In fact, skin colour seems to have become as important a marker as age and occupation.
"Women are treated as an asset (or parayadhan which means "others’ wealth") by the traditional Indian household," Krishnan said.

Fairness creams
An array of leading Bollywood stars endorse various skin whitening creams often with very regressive messages that end up promoting prejudice around skin colour and looks.
Cultural preference to look "beautiful" and the burden of fairness predominantly falls on women,forcing millions into using skin lightening creams such as "Fair and Lovely," introduced in early 1970s.

The Indian fairness cream market generates revenue of more than $400m and has been growing by 20 percent annually, according toBloomberg.
According to another report by the Associated Chambers of Commerce and Industry in India, the cosmetics industry is poised to double by 2014 to $3.6bn.
The cosmetics business has capitalised on peoples' insecurity, critics says, alleging the industry has been running insensitive and irresponsible campaigns to allure new customers.
Last year, public outcry erupted after a cosmetics firm launched a cream to lighten the skin around the vagina.
"The glorification of the fair skin has been there in our films for long, long time. But it only reflects the bias of the society," Das said.

Campaigns
But there are many among the film fraternity who have come out against these trends.
Bollywood filmmaker Shekhar Kapur, who directed films such as "Bandit Queen" and "Elizabeth", last year started a campaign with the Twitter hashtag "adswedontbuy" to protest against irresponsible ads, including ads for skin whitening creams. Millions joined the discussion within a period of 24 hours.


The campaigners behind "Dark is Beautiful" have also filed a petition with change.org asking Emami, a cosmetics company, to take down an advertisement promoting Fair and Handsome, a fairness cream for men.

Bollywood star Shahrukh Khan, who features in the ad, tosses a tube of the fairness cream to a youngster telling him that fairness is the secret to success in life.
An email request to the makers of "Fair and Handsome" cream to comment on the story was not answered at the time of publication of this article.

WOW’s founder Kavitha Emmanuel said activists plan to partner with like-minded organisations across India to bring the issue into the mainstream.

"Shahrukh is a national icon and if he leads the change he would be making a huge statement. We are trying to get in touch with him," she said.

In the past two decades, India has seen impressive growth: its middle class has burgeoned and more people, including women, go to universities and are part of the workforce.
However, many other prejudices such as colour bias and gender issues are still entrenched in the society.

"Caste attitudes have not eroded from the educated class," Krishnan said. "Regressive attitudes thrive among [the] privileged class."

Thanks to the campaign, many men and women, who have gone through discrimination themselves, have come out and blogged about their experiences.

For many like D'Mello, the shades of their skin have not stood in the way of their success, but for millions of other women the skin tan does become hurdle in their way to empowerment.
  
"Now the colour of my skin has become a very large part of life, it has become my identity," D’Mello said. "It no longer bothers me."



Saif Khalid http://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/features/2013/09/india-fair-skin-dark-campaign-das-20139181353151512.html